翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Ewanchuk ・ R v Faulkner ・ R v Fearon ・ R v Feeney ・ R v Finta ・ R v Forlee ・ R v G ・ R v George ・ R v Ghosh ・ R v Glad Day Bookshops Inc ・ R v Gladstone ・ R v Gladue ・ R v Gnango ・ R v Godoy ・ R v Goltz ・ R v Gonzales ・ R v Grant ・ R v Grantham ・ R v Grillo ・ R v Gruenke ・ R v Guerin ・ R v Généreux ・ R v Hall ・ R v Hancock ・ R v Handy ・ R v Hape ・ R v Harbottle ・ R v Harrison ・ R v Hasan ・ R v Hauser Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Gonzales ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Gonzales ''R. v. Gonzales'' (1962), 37 C.R. 56, was a landmark decision by the British Columbia Court of Appeal holding that Section 94(a) of the ''Indian Act'' did not violate the respondent's equality before the law, guaranteed under section 1(b) of the ''Canadian Bill of Rights'', because all Indians were treated in the same way. ''Gonzales'' is particularly famous for employing the similarly situated test, which was not used in ''R. v. Drybones'' and was explicitly rejected by the Supreme Court of Canada in ''Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia''. ==See also== *R. v. Drybones *Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia *The Canadian Crown and First Nations, Inuit and Métis * *Numbered Treaties *Indian Act *Section Thirty-five of the Constitution Act, 1982 *Indian Health Transfer Policy (Canada) 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Gonzales」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.